A NON-EEA national (Ms C) arrived in the United Kingdom in November 2009 with leave to enter as a Tier 4 (General) student valid until January 2010. In 2011 she applied for leave to remain as a Tier 1 (General) Migrant and this was granted until July 2013. In June 2016 Ms C was granted further leave to remain as a Tier 1 (General) migrant valid until July 2016. Following the completion of five years of continuous leave to remain as a Tier 1 (General) migrant, she applied for settlement. However, the Secretary of State refused the ILR application.
The refusal letter stated that enquiries had been made with the HMRC and their records stated that no earnings had been declared by her employer during the financial year 2010/11 which she had claimed as previous earning points during the first Tier 1 (General). Because of this, the Secretary of State also did not accept that the income for the settlement application was from genuine employment and awarded no points under paragraph 245CD(b) and (g) of the Rules. Furthermore, Secretary of State alleged deception under Paragraph 322 (5) of the Immigration Rules.
As the Points Based System does not attract a right of appeal, Ms C was given 14 calendar days to apply for Administrative Review (AR) challenging the Secretary of State’s decision to refuse her application. Ms C was not aware that the records held by HMRC were not accurate, nor that her previous employer had failed to register the employment with HMRC or pay the tax. At the time of the AR decision, she had no evidence to produce regarding her previous earnings, and even if the client had evidence to substantiate the case, it would not have been considered according to the AR guidance. The AR was conducted, and the Secretary of State maintained the decision and allegations of the deception regarding the previous earnings.
The next step taken by the client was the submission of a Pre-Action Letter, which contained only the same legal arguments presented at the time of the AR application. The Pre-Action letter was not accompanied by any explanation or additional evidence from her previous employer, or the efforts taken by the client seeking clarification regarding her earnings not being declared to HMRC during her employment. Because of lack of expert knowledge, the Pre-Action Letter failed, and the client was looking next to filing a Judicial Review (JR) application.
The JR process is not only costly, but also draining, and during the process, applicants have no legal status where they can retain their right to work.
Although it was great news to know UKVI was considering the matter again, we felt that ultimately fairness was not shown by UKVI regarding the legal fees that the client spent had during this process. Had UKVI initially requested additional information, clarification or documents while considering the client’s settlement application, additional legal expenses would not have been incurred by our client. A Y & J Solicitors negotiated the conditions of the consent order as it was in the best interest of our client to recover her legal costs incurred throughout the JR procedure.
Because of our hard work, the UKVI quashed the original ILR decision, granting the client and her dependent settlement and paid the costs incurred during the JR process. This family received their ILR and the reinstatement of their right to work within 6 months of the original ILR refusal.
We are pleased that we could help this family who is now due to apply for British Nationality.
Judicial Review for ILR Refusal Due to Tax Issues Under Para 322 (5) Many ILR (Indefinite Leave to Remain / Settlement) applications have been refused due to Tax amendments under paragraph 322 (5). Being branded as a person with undesirable character and threat to national security comes as a tremendous shock to some people who…
If you are reading this review then you must need legal support like we did a year ago and you are confused don’t know who to trust or who to select as this side of life was completely unknown to you!! So please read our story as it might guide you to the right direction. We had an ILR rejection back in Aug,2016 and it was one of the nasty allegation which is hard to get rid off. We were in tears, needed legal support and we didn’t know any solicitors. So based on reviews we selected A Y & J solicitors to pursue our AR and then Judicial Review. I still remember the day of our refusal I left an enquiry on their webpage and the next day Diana called me and spent over 45 minutes to take our case history and booked us to see Yash. At that point she won my heart as by then we already experienced that most solicitors don’t even spend a minute over the phone unless and until you pay any consultation fee. Yash was very open and honest. He showed us the true picture and let us decide to pursue JR or not! So finally from JR submission until we received the outcome it took about a year. Throughout these time at every stage they kept us well informed at all times. Waleed took over our case half way through. He is a very genuine and efficient person. We never ever had to remind him about anything as he was always ahead of the game. We have gone through an awful journey where sometimes we felt to give up but the team helped us to gain our trust back. Team members are very knowledgeable, caring, trustworthy and friendly. Throughout the time there was excellent communication, they kept us informed as soon as they had an update. The best part was they knew our case in details and never missed a single point. I have seen many people during our JR journey who had a bad experience from their solicitor and kept on complaining about them. Honestly speaking We can’t think of a single moment where they didn’t meet our expectations! Thank you guys for everything you did for us. You probably won’t have any idea how grateful we are to you. Keep up the good work. Wish you all the best. We will definitely refer them to people who need legal support. We were truly touched by your service. P.S. You can trust them closing your eyes!!!!